The laws governing appraisers and appraisals
Header image  
Professional Residential Real Estate Appraisers  
    Home Page   |   Lenders   |   Territory Map   |   Order Form    |   Services   |   Homeowners   |   About Us/Contact Us
 
 
 
 

The laws governing appraisers and appraisals

Want a copy of an appraisal report and you are not the client? Even if you are the homeowner!

Our appraisal will be delivered only to our client.  Under the confidentiality section of the Ethics Rule of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, we are under a strong obligation to our client, and may not discuss the results of the report with others, or provide copies of the report to others, without the written permission from our client.

Under 12 U.S.C.A. Section 1691 (e), part of the federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act, a residential mortgage applicant has the right to receive a copy of the appraisal report from the lender.  To receive the copy of the appraisal report, the borrower must request it in writing from the lender within ninety days of submitting the loan application.

Want to change the name of the company on your appraisal?

Institutions may not use “readdressed appraisals” -- appraisal reports that are altered by the appraiser to replace any references to the original client with the institution’s name.  Altering an appraisal report in a manner that conceals the original client or intended users of the appraisal is misleading and violates the agencies’ appraisal regulations and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP).  The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) (the agencies) are jointly issuing this statement to address concerns identified during examinations about the independence of the collateral valuation process.

What other laws apply to AQC accepting an appraisal assignment?

ETHICS RULE from USPAP regulations

Management

It is unethical for an appraiser to accept an assignment, or to have a compensation arrangement for an assignment, that is contingent on any of the following:

  • the reporting of a predetermined result (e.g., opinion of value);
  • a direction in assignment results that favors the cause of the client;
  • the amount of a value opinion;
  • the attainment of a stipulated result; or
  • the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the appraiser’s opinions and specific to the assignment’s purpose.

Conduct

In appraisal practice, an appraiser must not perform as an advocate for any party or issue.

An appraiser must not accept an assignment that includes the reporting of predetermined opinions and conclusions.

What additional laws apply to the appraisal process?

Please refer to the following webpages to access full copies of the appraisal laws put out by Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and other regulatory bodies.   

commerce.appraisalfoundation.org/html/USPAP2005

 

www.appraisalfoundation.org

 

realtor.org/law_and_policy/index.html

Below is the full text of a official statement made by these bodies addressing the issues discussed above.

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Office of Thrift Supervision

National Credit Union Administration

INDEPENDENT APPRAISAL AND EVALUATION FUNCTIONS

October 28, 2003

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) (the agencies) are jointly issuing this statement to address concerns identified during examinations about the independence of the collateral valuation process.  This statement applies to all real estate-related financial transactions originated or purchased by a regulated institution for its own portfolio or as assets held for sale. It provides further clarification of, and should be reviewed in conjunction with, the agencies’ appraisal and real estate lending regulations1 and the Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines (Guidelines).2

An institution’s board of directors is responsible for reviewing and adopting policies and procedures that establish and maintain an effective, independent real estate appraisal and evaluation program (program) for all of its lending functions.  The real estate lending functions include commercial real estate mortgage departments, capital market groups, and asset securitization and sales units. These independence concerns include the risk that improperly prepared appraisals may undermine the integrity of credit underwriting processes.  More broadly, an institution’s lending functions should not have undue influence that might compromise the program’s independence.

 

Selecting Individuals to Perform Appraisals or Evaluations

The Guidelines establish minimum standards for an effective program, including standards for selecting individuals who may perform appraisals or evaluations.  Among other considerations, the selection criteria must provide for the independence of the individual performing the appraisal or evaluation.  That is, the individual has neither a direct nor indirect, interest, financial or otherwise, in the property or transaction.  Institutions also need to ensure that the individual selected is competent to perform the assignment.  Consideration should be given to the individual’s qualifications, experience, and educational background.  Selection occurs when, based on an oral or written agreement, the individual accepts the assignment to appraise or evaluate a particular property. Moreover, appraisal or evaluation development work should not commence until the institution finalizes the selection process.  

The agencies’ appraisal regulations address appraiser independence and require that an institution, or its agent, directly engage the appraiser.  The only exception to this requirement is that an institution may use an appraisal prepared for another financial services institution, provided that the institution determines that the appraisal conforms to the agencies’ appraisal regulations and is otherwise acceptable.  Independence is compromised when an institution uses an appraiser who is recommended by the borrower or allows the borrower to select the appraiser from the institution’s list of approved appraisers.  

Institutions may not use an appraisal prepared by an individual who was selected or engaged by a borrower. An institution’s use of a borrower-ordered appraisal violates the agencies’ appraisal regulations.  Likewise, institutions may not use “readdressed appraisals” -- appraisal reports that are altered by the appraiser to replace any references to the original client with the institution’s name.  Altering an appraisal report in a manner that conceals the original client or intended users of the appraisal is misleading and violates the agencies’ appraisal regulations and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP).

When selecting and engaging individuals, an institution needs to identify the assignment and order the appropriate appraisal or evaluation, as discussed in the Guidelines.  To foster control and accountability, the agencies encourage an institution to use written engagement letters when ordering appraisals, especially for large, complex, or out-of-area commercial real estate properties. An institution should include a copy of the written engagement letter in the permanent loan file.  An appraiser may also incorporate an engagement letter in the appraisal report. The engagement letter confirms that the assignment was made in a manner that complies with the institution’s procedures and the agencies’ regulations and Guidelines. 

 

Appraisal and Evaluation Compliance Reviews

An institution’s appraisal and evaluation program must maintain effective internal controls that promote compliance with program standards and the agencies’ appraisal regulations and Guidelines.  Internal controls should, among other criteria, confirm that appraisals and evaluations are reviewed by qualified and adequately trained individuals who are not involved in the loan production processes.  The institution’s standards for and the depth of such reviews should reflect the risk of the transaction and the process through which the appraisal or evaluation is obtained.  An institution should establish more in depth review procedures for appraisals of large, complex or out-of-area commercial real estate credits and for those appraisals and evaluations that are ordered by agents of the institution, such as loan brokers or another financial services institution.

Even in small institutions when absolute lines of independence cannot be achieved, effective internal controls should be implemented to ensure that no single person has sole authority to render credit decisions involving loans on which they ordered or reviewed the appraisal or evaluation.  Further, lending officials, officers, or directors should abstain from any vote or approval involving loans for which they performed the appraisal or evaluation.

 

Supervisory Approach

Examiners will review an institution’s standards of independence, taking into consideration the size of the institution and the nature and complexity of its real estate-related activities.  Examiners will consider whether policies and procedures are comprehensive and applied uniformly to all units engaging in federally related transactions.

If an institution suspects that a licensed or certified appraiser is violating applicable laws or USPAP, or is otherwise engaging in other unethical or unprofessional conduct, the institution should make referrals directly to the appropriate state appraiser regulatory authorities.  Examiners finding evidence of unethical or unprofessional conduct, including improperly prepared appraisals or evaluations and readdressed appraisals, should forward their findings and their recommendations to their supervisory office for appropriate disposition and referral to the state appraiser regulatory authority, as necessary.  Institutions and institution-affiliated parties, including lenders, staff and fee appraisers, are reminded that they could be subject to enforcement actions, which include removal/prohibition orders, cease and desist orders, and civil money penalties, for violations of the agencies’ appraisal and real estate lending regulations.

 

1 OCC:  12 CFR 34, subparts C and D; FRB: 12 CFR 208 subpart E and appendix C, and 12 CFR 225 subpart G; FDIC:  12 CFR 323 and 12 CFR Part 365; OTS:  12 CFR Part 564, and 12 CFR 560.100, and 12 CFR 560.101; and NCUA: 12 CFR Part 722.5.

2 The interagency guidelines may be found in:  Comptroller’s Handbook for Commercial Real Estate and Construction Lending for OCC; SR letter 94-55 for FRB; FIL-74-94 for FDIC; and Thrift Bulletin 55a for OTS. NCUA was not a party to the Guidelines; however, the NCUA applies the content to credit unions, when applicable.